Filters
Clear Filters
Model
AGNPS
InfoWorks ICM
APEX
SWAT
AnnAGNPS
AVGWLF
QUAL2K
DYRESM�CAEDYM
WASP8
SWMM
SWAT - MODFLOW
PCSWMM
WAM
MIKE SHE
AGNPS-VSA
LSPC
MapShed
EcoHAT
NDP
Delft3D FM
PDP
WARMF
INCA
EFDC
GSSHA
L-THIA
WEP-N
QUAL2Kw
GBR Dynamic Sednet
DLEM
MIKE11
RGWLF
MIKE21
WEPP-WQ
DHSVM
MIKE HYDRO River
GLM
GBNP
FVCOM
SWAT+
CBP-WSM (Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model)
InVEST
SimplyP
HSPF
SSHBS
THMB
Delft3D
TETIS - N
Mike Basin
GWLF
GPUOM-WQ
SUSTAIN
ELEMeNT-N
MIKE 21 FM
SEAWAT-MODFLOW
SWAT-MODFLOW-RT3D
PCLake
CE-QUAL-W2
Water Body Type
Watershed
Water body
Location
The Great Barrier Reef
Florida
Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Other
Watershed Size
Large
Medium
Small
Watershed Type
Urban
Agricultural
Water Body Characteristics
Streams
Oceans
Reservoirs
Rivers
Estuarine
Coastal
Lakes
Water Body Size
Large
Medium
Small
Dimensions
1D
2D
3D
Simulation Type
Event-based model
Continuous model
Parameters
TSS
Water Levels
Primary production and plankton dynamics
Q
Flow velocity
nitrogen
Water levels
Sediment Transport
Temperature
salinity
TN
DO
TP
wave parameters
Chla
Reservoir Operations
Phosphorus
tidal and wave parameters
phosphorus
algae
TDS
Salinity
Nitrogen
Time Step
Daily
Minutes
Monthly
Hours
Annual
Seconds
Sub-daily
Model Complexity
Simple
Complex
Medium
Simulation Objectives
BMP cost estimation
Evaluate nitrogen loads in cold regions
TMDL development
BMP Evaluations
Holistic Simulation
evaluate water quality improvement
sustainable water resource management
Pollutant Transport
Assessment of Storm events
evaluate storm events
flood risk assessment
understanding and managing phosphorus fluxes within polder systems
Algal Bloom Predictions
Environmental Impact Assessments
evaluate combined and sanitary sewer overflows
Flood Risk Assessment
Assessing nitrogen pollution in watersheds
Evaluate legacy Nitrogen
Extreme events evaluation
Optimizing reservoir releases to manage downstream temperature and water quality
Screening Simulation
Watershed management to reduce sediment and nutrient loads entering the Great Barrier Reef
Support reservoir management decisions
Floodplain Mapping
Storm Surge analysis
Erosion analysis
Modeling the transport and transformation of pollutants
hydropower optimization
understanding and managing nitrogen fluxes within polder systems
Evaluate groundwater nutrient dynamics
Large-scale hydrologic modeling
assess the effects of land use change
flood and drought management
BMP locations
Climate Change Studies
Assess erosion variability due to management practices
predict nitrogen transport and transformation within a watershed
Evaluate hydrological and biogeochemical interactions in small streams
Understanding hydrological dynamics in snow-dominated regions
evaluate green infrastructure implementation
Ecosystem Assessments
Simulating large scale watersheds
assess sediment and nutrient transport
evaluate ecological restoration projects
Nutrient load assessment
Evaluate nutrient and carbon fluxes in stream networks
Support navigation
simulate watersheds with variable source areas
assessing phosphorus loss from agricultural lands
Evaluate BMP and low impact development stormwater controls
Wave-Current Interaction
management of eutrophication and algal blooms
Predict the effects of natural and anthropogenic changes on water quality
Water Supply Management
Watershed management
assess the effects of urbanization
Coastal and Estuarine Hydrodynamics
developing TMDL
Understanding contaminant transport through surface and subsurface systems
modeling of complex domains
Urban stormwater management and flood control
NPS nutrient loads evaluation
Data Requirements
Sediment characteristics
LULC
Sewer networks
Stream network
Flow
Soil
ET
Wind speed
Specific yield
Precipitation
Bathymetric data
Relative humidity
River reach characteristics
Temperature
Hydraulic data
DO
Wind
Algae
N surplus
Porosity
Water quality
Specific storage
Hydraulic conductivity
Wind Speed
Solar radiation
Geomorphic parameters
DEM
Model Availability
Open source
Open source
(https://www.epa.gov/water-research/storm-water-management-model-swmm)
Not open source
Open source
(www.ce.pdx.edu/w2)
Model Limitations
Neglects bank erosion processes
Poor nitrate simulation
CBPWSM does not model lag times
No provision for developing TMDLs
Simplified hydrological processes
Limited developer and community support
Limited applications in simulating chemical dynamics
Grid dependency can affect accuracy
Struggles with small-scale local flows
Does not simulate N
Lacks optimization procedures for reservoir operation
Runs a fully hydrodynamic simulation
Poor sediment simulation
Limited sediment transport modeling
Manual calibration
Does not allow multiple subbasins to connect to a single reach
Poor prediction of peak flows
Temporally lumped
Does not simulate vegetation or forest changes
Not suitable for shallow systems
Limited to small stream networks
Steady state conditions
Simplified Bottom seepage simulation
Fixed internal structure
Limited to main stream simulation
Does not incorporate wind effects
Does not support saturated runoff generating areas
Cannot model supercritical flow
Empirical water quality simulations
Limited hydrodynamics
Limited to polder systems
Requires detailed spatial data
Does not simulate small outlets loss directly
Limited applications for representing hydrological consequences of climate change
No Water Quality
Limited crop differentiation
Poor groundwater simulation
Limited to urban watersheds
Limited backwater flooding simulations
Limitations in storm sewer pipes simulation and calibration
Simplified vertical stratification
Limited model flexibility for internal modifications
Poor channel/river routing
Simplified Mixing Processes
Does not consider secondary currents
Dependent on input data
Assumes horizontal homogeneity
Requires high computational resources
Cannot simulate changes in aquatic ecosystem dynamics
Does not incorporate SOD
Limited to Florida terrain
Does not incorporate Zooplankton
Does not simulate BMPs
Not user friendly
Assumes channel slope is equal to zero
Empirical P simulations
Lumped model
Non-commercial purposes only
Does not simulate P
Poor simulation of small watersheds
Limited applications in the USA
Does not simulate baseflow
Point source loads are limited to constant loading rates for the entire simulation period
Accuracy decreases with higher trophic levels
Model expertise
Field scale model
Simulates N Only
Does not simulate physical characteristics of BMPs
Large spatial resolution
Calibration Complexity
Does not account for nitrate transport in the vadose zone
Does not deal with NPS pollution
Inaccurate seasonal & decadal and climate projections
Does not simulate urban watersheds
Limited applications in urban watersheds
Poor interactive process between surface and subsurface water
Limited to cold regions
Does not incorporate urban drainage
Monthly nutrient load outputs
Extensive datasets
Limited applications in subtropical regions
Cannot fully capture lateral floodplain interactions
Requires numerous parameters and complex calibration
Requires high resolution grids
Difficulty in verifying LID component for modeling bioretention cells
Does not consider specific algae species
Topography data may require preprocessing
limited to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Spatial limitations of the WSM preclude edge of field scale representation of phosphorus (P) losses
Sensitive to specific input parameters
Hydrostatic assumption for vertical momentum equation
Simplified soil P processes
Structured grids
Semi-distributed model
Can not be coupled with optimization algorithm
Simplified hydraulic processes
Simplified biogeochemical processes
Limited ability in addressing long-term legacy N dynamics
Requires high computational resources to be coupled with GA optimization
Limited to the Great Barrier Reef
Limited ecohydrological processes
GUI is not open source
High uncertainty
Poor simulation of extreme events
Model unstability with larger time steps
Poor simulation of suspended solids
Does not simulate specific agricultural and urban pollution inputs
Model Expertise
Does not simulate large watersheds
Simplified representation of nutrient dynamics
Lacks the conception of subbasin
Algal processes are oversimplifed
Dependent on Input Data
Loads modeled by scenarios with MP effects are always lower than the alternative scenario because the CBPWSM assigns a load reduction credit to each MP
Model Library
Model library serves as a comprehensive reference guide for various watershed and waterbody simulation models. It provides detailed descriptions of each model’s type, developers, capabilities, limitations, computational requirements, and data inputs and outputs. The aim is to assist researchers, policymakers, and practitioners in selecting the most suitable modeling tools for their specific application. Each model entry includes links to download resources if it is open-source, relevant references, and examples of practical applications to further support users in making informed decisions. For more details see Model Library .
Model
Watershed Size
Watershed Type
Simulation Objectives